El Segundo residential trash collection fee is resolved

by Michael D. Robbins
Director, Public Safety Project, PublicSafetyProject.org

February 3, 2011

The El Segundo residential trash collection fee has been resolved with a 3-1 vote of the City Council to have the City continue collecting trash from residential properties with three or four units, in addition to those with one or two units. This decision departs from the current City practice of collecting trash at no fee from residential properties with one to four or more units if standard trash cans are used instead of a large rectangular trash bin. City Attorney Mark Hensley stated that it was not necessary to amend the City Municipal Code for the City to continue collecting trash for three and four unit properties. He said the City Municipal Code creates an exclusive franchise for the City to collect trash from residential properties with one or two units, all owners or tenants of those properties are required to use the City’s service, and no private trash haulers can provide this service. To amend the City municipal code to create an exclusive franchise for residential properties with three or four units is not necessary and is a five-year long process.

The affected residential properties with more than four units will have to contract with a private trash hauler and pay for the service, however, the City will include in its upcoming trash collection contract Request For Proposal (RFP) a requirement to offer trash collection service to the affected properties at the same cost as the City would have paid. The trash hauler that is awarded the contract, and not the City, will bill the affected residential property owners that choose to use the City’s trash hauler.

At first, City Council member Don Brann made a motion to continue the existing City practice of collecting trash without fee from residential properties with one to four or more units that use standard trash cans. His motion was seconded by Council member Suzanne Fuentes, and won by a 3-1 vote with Brann, Fuentes, and Mayor Pro Tem Bill Fisher voting “yes” and Mayor Eric Busch voting “no”. Councilman Carl Jacobson abstained due to a conflict of interest (he owns a four-unit residential property in the city).

But then the Director of Public Works spoke and muddied the waters, causing some confusion. Mayor Pro Tem wanted to take back his vote. He made a motion to reconsider, which was seconded by Fuentes and passed by a 3-1 vote with Fisher, Fuentes, and Busch voting “yes” and Brann voting “no”. Suzanne Fuentes then made a motion to direct staff to include three and four unit properties in the next trash collection contract. Bill Fisher seconded the motion, and it passed by a 3-1 vote, with Fuentes, Fisher, and Bran voting “yes” and Busch voting “no”.

There was discussion about including an option in the RFP for the trash hauler awarded the contract to offer service for a fee at the City’s rate to residential properties with more than four units that use standard trash cans.

Mayor Eric Busch was visibly upset that he did not have enough votes to support his agenda to discontinue the City’s residential trash collection service to properties with more than two units in order to save an estimated $130,000 per year at the expense of the residents. Cost increases to apartment building owners would likely and reasonably be passed on to the tenants.

The current residential trash collection system works fine. If it is not broken, then don’t fix it, and certainly don’t break it.

Mayor Eric Busch’s attempt to discontinue city trash collection service for residential properties with more than two units that use standard trash cans might have broken the system for the older buildings that have no space to accommodate a large rectangular trash bin. It may also have resulted in many more trash trucks from different companies driving routes through our residential neighborhoods to service the affected properties.

Mayor Eric Busch’s priorities are in the wrong place if he really wants to stop squandering taxpayer money. He wants to “save” $130,000 per year by cutting City services to residents, at the same time he is wasting at least $9 million per year in wildly excessive and unsustainable firefighter and police “special compensation” ($3 million excess per year) and CalPERS pension “employer contributions” and “employee contributions” paid by the City ($6 million excess per year). But then again, the firefighter and police unions endorsed him, contributed money to his City Council campaign, and campaigned enthusiastically for him.

Posted in El Segundo News, El Segundo Tax and Fee Increases | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on El Segundo residential trash collection fee is resolved

El Segundo residential trash collection fee is not a dead issue

by Michael D. Robbins
Director, Public Safety Project, PublicSafetyProject.org

January 24, 2011

The El Segundo residential trash collection fee is back on the City Council agenda for the February 1, 2011 meeting. At issue is whether the City will stop collecting trash from residential properties with three or four units on a lot. It has been a long-standing City practice and tradition, going back at least to the early 1990’s, for the City to collect trash without fee from single family homes, and residential properties with two to four units on a lot, as long as standard trash cans are used instead of the large rectangular trash bins. Existing taxes pay for this service.

However, there is an inconsistency between the existing practice and the El Segundo Municipal Code, which provides only for City trash collection for single family homes and residential properties with two units on a lot. The logical solution is simply to amend the city’s municipal code to be consistent with the long-standing actual practice.

Please contact the El Segundo City Council members and urge them to amend the city’s municipal code to continue the long-standing City practice of collecting trash from all residential properties with one to four units on a lot that use standard trash cans. Remind them that the residents can use a voter initiative to amend the El Segundo Municipal Code for them if they won’t do it. Also attend the February 1, 2011 City Council meeting at 7:00 PM if you can, at 350 Main Street, on the southeast corner at Holly Ave., across from Stuft Pizza. Enter the City Council chamber lobby through the glass doors on the southwest side of the building, on the north side of the patio.

The City Council member phone numbers and emails can be found on the official El Segundo City web site Elected Officials page at http://www.elsegundo.org/depts/elected/default.asp.

The City Council email addresses (as of January 2, 2011) can also be found on the El Segundo City Employee Salaries web page at http://PublicSafetyProject.org/blog/2011/01/02/call-to-action-citizens-of-el-segundo-need-your-help/.

If the City Council does not amend the municipal code to continue the current practice, there may be many different large trash collection trucks from different companies driving through the residential areas of our city to service the affected properties. Also, many of the residential properties with three or four units on a lot have older structures with no space to accommodate a large rectangular trash bin required for collection by a private company. If the property owners take away a garage or one or two parking spaces from tenants to make space for a large rectangular trash bin, they will probably be in violation of the zoning code, which specifies the number of garages and parking spaces required based on the zone and the number of residential units. Furthermore, some of these properties are on hills which would make it impractical and unsafe to use large rectangular trash bins.

However, it appears that the City Council majority may still be trying to cut services, which effectively increases taxes and fees, to continue enriching city employees – especially firefighter and police union members and their managers – with wildly excessive and unsustainable salaries, benefits, and pensions.

To charge trash collection fees only to residential properties with three or four units on a lot would require another Proposition 218 vote with protest ballots, which we just completed for one and two residential units on a lot, and the City Council majority lost. The other way to effectively increase taxes and fees is to eliminate or reduce city services. Proposition 218 probably does not require a protest vote by property owners and tenants before the elimination or reduction of city services to properties and property owners (this needs to be verified).

Posted in California, El Segundo, El Segundo News, El Segundo Tax and Fee Increases, Tax Policy and Issues | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on El Segundo residential trash collection fee is not a dead issue

A Victory for El Segundo Residents and Residential Property Owners (House or Two Units)

by Michael D. Robbins
Director, Public Safety Project, PublicSafetyProject.org

January 19, 2011

Congratulations! We won again! Thank you for sending in your Proposition 218 Trash Fee Protest Ballots before the deadline. A total of 1,850 unverified protest ballots were sent to City Hall, and only a total of 1,439 verified protest ballots were needed to defeat the new residential trash collection fee. The City Council voted 3-2 at its January 18, 2011 meeting, to accept the unverified protest ballots as sufficient without having the City Clerk’s staff spend the time to open all the envelopes, verify that the ballots were properly completed and signed, and count the valid ones that are not duplicates from owners and tenants of the same property.

City Council member Don Brann made the motion to accept the unverified protest ballots as sufficient. Mayor Eric Busch tried to ignore the motion and said that the City Clerk would come back to the City Council with the results after the protest ballots were verified and counted. Council member Don Brann caught this apparent maneuver to avoid a vote and move on to the next agenda item, and he stated that he made a motion. Council member Carl Jacobson seconded the motion for discussion. After brief discussion, Council member Don Brann asked for a vote. Mayor Eric Busch and Mayor Pro Tem Bill Fisher voted “NO”, and Council members Don Brann, Carl Jacobson, and Suzanne Fuentes voted “Yes” on the motion.
This vote by mail election used a strange system where properties for which no Protest Ballot is completed, signed, and returned before the deadline COUNT AS YES VOTES, and Protest Ballots from both the owner and tenant(s) of the same property COUNT AS ONLY ONE NO VOTE.

The first year of the trash fee would have cost residents an estimated $560,700, which is less than the estimated $596,657 total compensation paid to former El Segundo Police Chief David Cummings in 2009 from all sources – including his city contract and pension income while working for the city after his retirement. This is an enormous amount of compensation for any city, but especially for the City of El Segundo, California, which has about 5.5 square miles and about 16,000 or 17,000 population.

This is our second victory in our effort to stop the City Council majority from imposing City of Bell-style taxes and fees on businesses and residents to pay to continue enriching City employee union members and their managers – especially the firefighter and police union members and their managers – with wildly excessive and unsustainable salaries, benefits, and pensions that threaten to bankrupt our city.

Our first victory was the defeat of Measure O on the November 2, 2010 election ballot by 55% “NO” to 45% “YES”. Measure O was the $4 million business Utility Users Tax increase that would have been passed on to the customers as a cost of doing business. Measure O would have increased business electricity, water, gas, and telephone Utility Users Taxes by $2 million per year for two years and then it would have sunset. It was put on the ballot by a 5-0 vote of the City Council as a misguided attempt to balance the city budget, and resolve a more than $8 million budget shortfall that was caused primarily by the wildly excessive and unsustainable salaries, benefits, and compensation of the firefighter and police union members and their managers.


Posted in California, El Segundo, El Segundo Election Coverage, El Segundo News, El Segundo Tax and Fee Increases, Elections, Firefighter and Police Union Compensation and Pensions, Fraud Waste and Abuse, Government Employee Compensation and Pensions, News, Political Corruption, Politics, Tax Policy and Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Victory for El Segundo Residents and Residential Property Owners (House or Two Units)

Everyone in El Segundo must defeat the greatest threat facing our city – the firefighters union initiative

Everyone in El Segundo must defeat the greatest threat facing our city – the firefighters union initiative

by Michael D. Robbins
Director, Public Safety Project, PublicSafetyProject.org

January 19, 2011

All El Segundo residents and business owners must work even harder to defeat the greatest threat facing our city and our safety – the firefighters union initiative. If their union initiative passes, we will permanently lose our Paramedic Transport Service, and depend on out-of-town ambulances with increased hospital transport times and fees. This is dangerous for everybody who lives, works, or does business in El Segundo, but it is especially dangerous for the elderly in our city. Almost all of the fire department calls are paramedic calls. El Segundo has few fire, and zero, one, or two major structure fires (with $100,000 in damage or more) per year.

The El Segundo City Council will decide at its February 15, 2011 meeting which election date the very dangerous firefighters union initiative will appear on the ballot for El Segundo voters.
The firefighters union initiative, which was circulated almost entirely by firefighter union members who do not live in the city, will force our city to give up local control over our city fire department and contract with Los Angeles County for a minimum of ten years. The L.A. County Fire Department will be the Employer of Record for all the firefighters and paramedics, and our city will not be able to fire any of them for incompetence or dishonesty.

The only reason the union circulated their initiative petition is to protect and lock in their wildly excessive and unsustainable compensation and pensions by going to the L.A. County Fire Department – and dragging all of us with them. The firefighters union president, Christopher Thomason, had total 2009 compensation of at least $256,131. The “proponent” of the initiative, Bryan Partlow, is the only firefighter (or one of two) living in the city. He is one of the lowest paid firefighters, yet his total 2009 compensation was at least $134,674.
The L.A. County Fire Department does not provide Paramedic Transport Service. They rely on out-of-town private ambulance companies. The L.A. County Fire Department paramedics drive utility pickup trucks that cannot transport an injured person to a hospital. El Segundo will permanently lose its legal grandfather status under state law and court decisions that allow El Segundo to regulate and operate Paramedic Transport Service in the City of El Segundo.

Also, all of the city’s expensive, high quality fire department vehicles, apparatus, and equipment will become the property of the Los Angeles County Fire Department, or will be sold at a significant discount as surplus or for salvage value. If the we wants to regain local control over our fire and paramedic response services (no more paramedic transport service), we will have to wait until the ten-year contract expires, and then spend many millions of dollars at one time to purchase a new fire truck and new fire engines and utility vehicles. This will place a tremendous burden on our city, and we will never regain the most important part of our fire department – our Paramedic Transport Service.

Furthermore, if the dangerous firefighters union initiative is not defeated, the Los Angeles County Fire Department will have no reason or incentive to negotiate with our city in good faith for the level of service, price, or contract terms, because they will know that El Segundo has no choice but to contract with L.A. County.

Posted in California, El Segundo, El Segundo Election Coverage, El Segundo News, Elections, Firefighter and Police Union Compensation and Pensions, Firefighter Union Corruption, Government Employee Compensation and Pensions, Measure P - Firefighters Union Initiative, Political Corruption, Politics, Union Corruption | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Everyone in El Segundo must defeat the greatest threat facing our city – the firefighters union initiative

CALL TO ACTION: The citizens of El Segundo need your help

by Michael D. Robbins
Director, Public Safety Project, PublicSafetyProject.org

January 2, 2011

This is an urgent Call to Action. The citizens of El Segundo need your help. They are about to lose their city fire department and paramedic transport service as a result of excessive and unsustainable labor union contracts – especially the fire and police union contracts.

Here is what you can do to help:

First, email this web page URL to everyone you know who may be interested and may want to help:

http://PublicSafetyProject.org/elsegundo/elsegundo_payroll.html

Second, if you want to help in other ways, send an email to the Public Safety Project using the following email address, and provide your name, contact information, and your offer to help. Put “WANT TO HELP” in the subject line. Thank you very much.

Third, if you live or work in El Segundo, and you want to save our fire department from a takeover by Los Angeles County, and loss of our Paramedic Transport service, then please send an email to the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and each of the other City Council members.

Their email address appear below, followed by a sample email message. If you click on each of the email links, it should open up your email client program and pre-fill the email address, subject field, and message body field with a sample email, which you can change using information from this web site or other information or thoughts you may have.

Mayor Eric Busch
EBusch@ElSegundo.org

Mayor Pro Tem Bill Fisher
BFisher@ElSegundo.org

Councilwoman Suzanne Fuentes
SFuentes@ElSegundo.org

Councilman Carl Jacobson
CJacobson@ElSegundo.org

Councilman Dr. Don Brann
DBrann@ElSegundo.org

SAMPLE EMAIL:

To: EBusch@ElSegundo.org
Subject: Keep our local fire department and cut the union pay

Dear Mayor Busch,

Please keep our local fire department and vote against any further action towards a Los Angeles County takeover of our fire services. We do not want to lose our locally controlled paramedic transport service.

The real problem is excessive and unsustainable city employee union contracts, especially the fire and police union contracts.

Also, vote against tax increases and new fees on residents or businesses, including a new trash tax or fee. The fire and police union pay, benefits, and pensions are the primary cause of our city’s financial problems and that is where most of the spending cuts must come from.

Thank you for your consideration in this important matter.

Posted in California, El Segundo, El Segundo Election Coverage, El Segundo News, Measure P - Firefighters Union Initiative | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on CALL TO ACTION: The citizens of El Segundo need your help

Union provisions need to be changed – Letter to the Beach Reporter by Edward C. Caprielian

The following letter to the editor was published in the Beach Reporter newspaper (TBRnews.com) on Thursday, December 30, 2010 in the Letters section. The Beach Reporter has a strict 250-word limit.


Union provisions need to be changed

A present provision in the Memorandum of Understanding between the city of Manhattan Beach and the Manhattan Beach Police Officers Association requires mutual agreement on changes in the city’s Employee/Employer Relations Resolution.

In effect, the city is unable, without agreement from POA, to meet its legal responsibilities mandated by state law regarding the determination of legislative and managerial policies. These policies include determining the composition of bargaining units; selection of organizations to represent employees; use of city resources by employee unions; exclusion of high-level managers and confidential employees as union members; and procedures for resolving impasses.

In essence, the POA could dissipate managerial authority by legislating a larger number of smaller bargaining units, creating administrative nightmares, multiple time-consuming negotiations, encouraging end runs to influence elected officials, and union gamesmanship to achieve the highest settlement agreements.

In addition, it creates the specter of managers as union members negotiating agreements across the table with their union employees and fostering divisiveness and competition among managers for scarce resources. Furthermore, the POA is placed to promote processes that remove managerial discretion in the resolution of contract disputes.

These are among the realities that have weakened management authority in the public sector making it the leading cause of the inordinate increases in public employee wages, pension and retirement benefits.

The labor agreements between the police and the cities of Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, El Segundo, Culver City, Hawthorne, Santa Monica, Newport Beach, Fountain Valley, Beverly Hills and Torrance have no similar provision. Why do we?

Edward C. Caprielian, Manhattan Beach

Posted in Beach Reporter Letters, Firefighter and Police Union Compensation and Pensions, Government Employee Compensation and Pensions, Letters to the Editor, Police Union Corruption | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Union provisions need to be changed – Letter to the Beach Reporter by Edward C. Caprielian

1970-1972 Firefighter and Police Union City Council Campaigns

HISTORICAL NEWS ARTICLES

Documenting the Firefighter, Police, and School Teacher Unions’ Political Campaigns


1970-1972 El Segundo Firefighter and Police Union City Council Campaigns


El Segundo Herald

Excerpt from page 5, column 3 in the print edition

Former Mayors Reflect on Past Challenges

October 28, 2010

By Brian Simon

Mayor Gordon Stephens (1970-1972): Stephens sees a parallel between the current contentious labor talks between the City Council and local bargaining units and what he described as “difficulties negotiating with our safety employees” during his tenure. “They went door to door to gain sympathetic supporters,” he remembers, noting that attendance at the hearing was so large as to cause the meeting to move its location to the high school auditorium. “The council’s initial position was that after a survey of other cities’ pay and benefits, we offered the midpoint of the survey, realizing El Segundo did not have as much hazardous activity as any of the surveyed cities,” Stephens said. “The matter was settled by compromise, much like today’s predicament.”


El Segundo Herald newspaper web site:
http://www.heraldpublications.com/herald/el-segundo-herald

October 28, 2010 El Segundo Herald newspaper:
http://www.heraldpublications.com/herald/sites/default/files/publications/elsegundo/Herald_102810/index.html

View or download the October 28, 2010 edition of the El Segundo Herald newspaper (7.68 MB PDF file):
http://www.heraldpublications.com/herald/sites/default/files/publications/elsegundo/Herald_102810/eMagFiles/source/Herald%2010.28.10.pdf


Posted in El Segundo News, Firefighter and Police Union Compensation and Pensions, Firefighter Union Corruption, Government Employee Compensation and Pensions, Historical News, Police Union Corruption | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 1970-1972 Firefighter and Police Union City Council Campaigns

Mayor Carl Jacobson provided leadership to resolve 1988 revenue crisis

El Segundo History

Former Mayor Reflects on Past Challenges


Mayor Carl Jacobson provided leadership to resolve 1988 revenue crisis


El Segundo Herald

Excerpt from article on page 5, column 4 in the print edition

Former Mayors Reflect on Past Challenges

October 28, 2010

By Brian Simon

Mayor Carl Jacobson (1988-1996):

Though he is now back on the Council and dealing with the City’s current financial crisis, Jacobson also had a major budget dilemma to contend with when he became Mayor in 1988. Two-thirds of the City’s revenue base had previously come from use taxes collected from Chevron’s sale of fuel oil to Edison. But when the Public Utilities Commission ordered Edison to switch to the cleaner-burning natural gas, all that revenue went bye-bye.

To address the issue, Jacobson and the Council revamped the business license and utility user tax structure to provide replacement revenue streams. The tax increases were phased in over time. “It was an absolute necessity and done during a decent economy that was nothing like the condition we are in right now,” said Jacobson, who added that the Council even lowered the business license tax by the end of his tenure.

Jacobson also successfully lobbied to increase the City’s share of local property taxes from five percent to seven (since lowered by the State to 6.25). In contrast, the County receives 66 percent—the largest chunk of any city in California. “People pay a lot of property tax, but we [the City] don’t get it,” Jacobson said.


El Segundo Herald newspaper web site:
http://www.heraldpublications.com/herald/el-segundo-herald

October 28, 2010 El Segundo Herald newspaper:
http://www.heraldpublications.com/herald/sites/default/files/publications/elsegundo/Herald_102810/index.html

View or download the October 28, 2010 edition of the El Segundo Herald newspaper (7.68 MB PDF file):
http://www.heraldpublications.com/herald/sites/default/files/publications/elsegundo/Herald_102810/eMagFiles/source/Herald%2010.28.10.pdf


Posted in El Segundo News, El Segundo Tax and Fee Increases, Historical News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Mayor Carl Jacobson provided leadership to resolve 1988 revenue crisis

A Stink in El Segundo Over Cadillac Salaries by Paul Teetor – LA Weekly


Original article (page 1):
http://www.laweekly.com/2010-10-14/news/a-stink-in-el-segundo-over-cadillac-salaries/

Original article (page 2):
http://www.laweekly.com/2010-10-14/news/a-stink-in-el-segundo-over-cadillac-salaries/2/

Original article, printer-friendly version:
http://www.laweekly.com/content/printVersion/1089541/


A Stink in El Segundo Over Cadillac Salaries

Cops earn $175,000, firefighters $210,000, in a town with few criminals or fires

By Paul Teetor
published: October 14, 2010

The debate over skyrocketing government-worker salaries got nasty in El Segundo when a homeowner published the six-figure salaries flowing to the small town’s cops and firefighters on his Gundo Blogger website — only to have a police captain track him down by phone at his UCLA job and chew him out.

The uneasy homeowner, David Burns, tells L.A. Weekly that Capt. Robert Turnbull “called me from his office to complain about my blog. … He insisted on talking about it right now. I finally had to hang up on him.”

Burns then sent Turnbull an e-mail explaining his policy of separating his blog from his job as manager of emergency preparedness at UCLA.

In a response that would have unnerved many citizens, the high-ranking cop e-mailed Burns back: “I will continue to call you at work whenever I want, as you may do the same for me, since our numbers are publicly listed.”

Turnbull vehemently objected to Burns claiming on his blog that the captain’s total pay is $302,000, insisting it should be “only” $225,000 — the amount the city defines as Turnbull’s “total earnings.”

But as Burns explains, he included “the hidden costs. [Turnbull] was trying to exclude all the extra money and special benefits beyond his base salary, but that all comes from the taxpayer’s pocket.”

Either way, it’s a staggering sum to pay a police captain in a tiny city of 16,000 residents, with zero murders in 2009, according to FBI data — and only 36 violent crimes. By contrast, not counting benefits, the Los Angeles Police Department pays its captains an average of $168,000.


PHOTO BY TED SOQUI
The Gundo Blogger David Burns: tracked to his job by police and harangued for whistle-blowing

After the exchange of testy e-mails, Burns put the unsettling incident aside. But a month later he received a notification that Turnbull had filed a California Public Records Act request to see the details of Burns’ salary and benefits at UCLA’s Emergency Management Office.

“He was trying to harass and intimidate me, make trouble for me,” Burns says. “This is a powerful guy who wears a gun and a badge in the town where I live.”

Turnbull denies he was harassing Burns, saying: “If I was, I would have called him right back.” He argues, “I was just exercising my rights as a citizen. He talks the talk on salary cuts, so I wanted to see if he walks the walk.”

After the incident, Burns pointedly wrote on his Gundo Blogger site: “I don’t make over $100,000 annually. … Since 2007, my salary has been reduced annually and frozen. … To date, the cuts equal nearly 23 percent overall. … No whining, no bitching, no moaning. I would welcome the El Segundo Safety Associations to follow suit.”

Burns became a target because he published stunning El Segundo city salary data obtained by another civic critic, Mike Robbins, who filed a California Public Records Act request and got his hands on a treasure trove of city documents.

The two men discovered that 78 percent of the town’s 262 full-time employees will be handed more than $100,000 apiece in total compensation in the 2010-11 fiscal year.

El Segundo is a 1950s-style suburban gem with row upon row of Craftsman bungalows tucked between noisy LAX to the north and tony Manhattan Beach to the south. The nonresidential half of town is heavy on tech, industry and military. Municipal challenges are few; city government jobs are not hard. There’s no clear reason for anyone to earn anything but small-town government incomes.

Yet thanks to a voting majority made up of three of the five City Council members — Mayor Eric Busch, Mayor Pro Tem Bill Fisher and Councilman Carl Jacobson — El Segundo taxpayers, not unlike the now-bankrupt city of Vallejo, are paying Cadillac salaries to cops, firefighters and other workers.

El Segundo is nearly broke. Last week ­— two years after the City Council, amidst the deep recession, handed city employees a series of fat raises ­­— the council tapped out the last few cents from its reserve funds.

“We’re Mayberry-by-the-Sea,” Burns says. “We can’t afford these crazy salaries and pensions.”

Recently departed Police Chief David Cummings hauled in $425,000 last year, including a $200,000 “leave buyout” that almost doubled his final year’s take. Cummings was hired for six months as an El Segundo contract employee, even while starting to draw his $210,000 pension.

“Chief Cummings’ real take last year was north of $525,000,” Councilman Don Brann, the only El Segundo council member who called for fiscal sanity, tells the Weekly. Cummings did not respond to several messages seeking comment.

The Weekly has learned that 23 city employees are being paid more than $250,000 in total compensation this fiscal year, while nine get more than $300,000 and four get more than $350,000.

In December 2008 and April 2009, the City Council handed big raises to police and firefighters. They also included concessions purportedly aimed at saving money over the longer term. Brann predicted dire consequences, but lost every vote 4-1. (A fifth council member, Suzanne Fuentes, was not on the council then and did not participate in those votes.)

“I warned them it was fiscally irresponsible,” Brann says. “Now we’ve got a real mess on our hands.”

It appears that few city employees are being paid normal wages. Today, El Segundo sworn firefighters average $210,000 in salaries and benefits. But they handle only a few structure fires each year, mostly responding to lower-level paramedic calls — not a $210,000 firefighting job by any measure.

Similarly, the town’s police officers average $175,000 in total compensation — far beyond normal cop pay in California — but see so little action that their biggest recent case involved a flasher who harassed girls.

Burns’ father was a cop, as was his uncle. He has worked with police and firefighters throughout his 20-year civilian career in emergency services.

“I respect public-safety guys individually,” he says. “But together they’ve become a too-powerful political force that is damaging our city.”

The simmering salary debate escalated this summer with a smart bomb launched by Robbins, a former councilman–turned–gadfly who filed a public-records request and got documents showing the total compensation of all city employees — by name. He posted the explosive data at his blog, publicsafetyproject.org.

A few weeks later the Los Angeles Times broke its blockbuster corruption story about the city of Bell. After that, El Segundo City Council, which boasts about the town’s free trash pickup — a heavy tax burden is borne by oil giant Chevron and aerospace megacorporations — was beset with demands for spending cutbacks and union concessions.

“The taxpayers of El Segundo can’t afford these bloated compensation packages handed out to police and fire,” says Robbins, a software engineer. “It’s unsustainable.”

In the last decade, Robbins said, El Segundo has become a small-scale model of the type of government takeover by public unions that is happening all over California. He urged taxpayers to connect the dots.

“Police and fire unions have become major political forces by endorsing and funding their preferred candidates,” Robbins says. “When those candidates get [onto city councils] they are beholden to the unions. It’s big city–style politics.”

Last week, the council approved a budget for the 2010 fiscal year that began October 1. The council achieved it by draining the $3.6 million city reserves, which temporarily balanced the $55.5 million General Fund.

Mayor Busch, who was endorsed by the police and fire department unions — and then voted to approve their raises — insists, “I would do the same thing again.” He calls it “fiscally responsible for the long term.”

Brann, who wasn’t endorsed by the police or firefighters, strongly disagrees: “All the budget trend lines were moving in the wrong direction. But who wants to fight the police and firefighters?”

Especially when a high-ranking cop thinks it appropriate to find your place of work, check out your salary and give you a tongue-lashing if you dare to expose the $302,000 in pay and bennies he gets to police a tiny city where, until now, little ever happened.

Contact the writer at paulteetor@verizon.net.

Posted in El Segundo News, Firefighter and Police Union Compensation and Pensions, Government Employee Compensation and Pensions, Police Union Corruption | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Stink in El Segundo Over Cadillac Salaries by Paul Teetor – LA Weekly